Updated: July 2026 ยท 7 min read

SubmitHub vs Groover โ€” Full Comparison

The two biggest names in paid playlist and curator pitching, compared side by side. Both work โ€” the right pick depends on your budget, timeline, and target audience's geography.

Pricing changes over time on both platforms. Numbers below are ranges accurate as of mid-2026 โ€” check our full SubmitHub review and our full Groover review for more detail, and each platform's own pricing page for the latest numbers.

Side by Side

SubmitHubGroover
Currency / modelUSD credits, pay-per-pitchGrooviz (โ‰ˆโ‚ฌ1 each), pay-per-pitch
Entry costSmall packs from ~$10Minimum pack ~โ‚ฌ46
Cost per submission1-5 credits (~$1-3+) depending on curator tier2 Grooviz standard, 4-6 for top curators
Response guarantee48 hours7 days
Missed-response refundWritten feedback guaranteed regardlessAutomatic credit refund if no response
Free credits1-2 free credits/day for activityNot offered
Curator baseGlobal, large blog + playlist network3,000+, Europe-weighted
Includes blogs?YesYes, plus radio and labels

When SubmitHub Makes More Sense

When Groover Makes More Sense

Or Use Both

These aren't mutually exclusive โ€” many artists run both platforms per release, especially once free-platform submissions are exhausted. SubmitHub for speed and a US/global reach, Groover for European curators and the larger network. The overlap in curators between the two is small enough that running both isn't wasted spend.

Song Pitch tracks submissions and spend across both platforms โ€” and every other one โ€” in a single log, so comparing what actually worked isn't a manual spreadsheet job.

Install Song Pitch โ€” Free

Conclusion

Neither platform is objectively "better" โ€” SubmitHub wins on speed and low entry cost, Groover wins on network breadth and automatic refunds. If budget allows, running both across a release covers the most ground; if not, pick based on the response-time and geography factors above.